Procurement: Lease Versus Buy

Archives

May 8, 2014: Since September 11, 2001 many nations have found that expensive new battlefield technologies and services can more be obtained more cheaply via leases and contractors than buying the gear outright and training military personnel to use and maintain it. For operations in Afghanistan this was a big help, financially and operationally. This was especially true with UAVs, which many NATO nations in Afghanistan had never operated before. Commanders and troops saw the obvious advantage of UAVs and leasing allowed them to get the benefits quickly without all training and set-up expenses. Israeli firms were particularly eager to lease larger UAVs (like the Heron, which is the same size and capabilities as the U.S. Predator). Israeli firms also leased smaller UAVs, although the smallest ones available for lease were the very popular (and easy to use) American Raven. This was a two kg (5 pound) UAV very popular with the infantry and ground combat troops in general. For NATO nations with troops in Afghanistan leasing Ravens was attractive because these UAVs are heavily used in combat but were used a lot less back home. So enough Ravens were leased for battlefield use and a smaller number bought for training back home.

 

X

ad

Help Keep StrategyPage Open

First came Facebook, then came Twitter, and finally, AI has arrived. They have all caused a decline in our business, but AI may be the deadliest innovation. We are currently in survival mode. Our writers and staff receive no payment in some months, and even when they do, it is below the minimum wage for their efforts. You can support us with your donations or subscriptions. Please help us keep our doors open.

Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on X.

Subscribe   Donate   Close